MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Internal Structure Of An Ilmenite Mine Waste Rock Pile Modelled From Ip Imaging And Laboratory Measurements

2010· article· en· W2319184843 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michel Chouteau, Rachid Intissar, Michel Aubertin

Bibliographic record

Venue23rd EEGS Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogeologyWater contentElectrical resistivity tomographyGeologyElectrical resistivity and conductivityInduced polarizationPileMineralogyGrain sizeSaturation (graph theory)Geotechnical engineeringLayeringSoil scienceGeophysicsGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nickel concentrations occasionally above the allowed norm have been measured in water samples in the vicinity of the Petitpas waste rock pile at the Tio mine, Québec, Canada. In order to understand the chemical and hydrodynamic mechanisms responsible for the nickel dissolution and release in the environment a large hydrogeological/geotechnical/geophysical study was undertaken on the very large rock pile (600 m x 300 m x 150 m). Geotechnical and physical properties were measured in the laboratory on samples of waste with various moisture content and salinity. Induced polarization allowed the determination of electrical resistivities and chargeabilities that were to be used to interpret time-domain IP tomography surveys carried out on the waste rock pile. IP survey data were inverted in 2-D. The resistivity models for all survey lines show common features. From surfae to 25-30 m depth, the subsurface is resistive and show lateral changes which suggests large grain size heterogeneities and low water content; below and up to 50 m, a quasi uniform layer with resistivities in the range 50-250 ohm.m suggests fine-grained material with increased saturation. Finally below a depth of 50 m, the subsurface becomes very resistive again, indicative of coarse low-moisture content material. The chargeability model shows no structural correlation with the resistivity model. In general, chargeabilities are very large (up to 100 mV/V) and show no layering. From the laboratory and the survey results, we interpret the resistivity to be sensitive to water content and salinity while chargeability is sensitive to the metal concentration. The geoelectrical model and the interpreted hydrogeotechnical model will be useful for modeling water flow and reactive transport through the waste rock pile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.704
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.171
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue23rd EEGS Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental ProblemsSame topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207