Effect of Pendant Group Structure on the Hydrolytic Stability of Polyaspartamide Polymers under Physiological Conditions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We describe the synthesis of metal chelating polymers based on polyaspartamide and polyglutamide backbones as carriers for (111)In in radioimmunoconjugates. These polymers [PAsp(DTPA), PGlu(DTPA)] have a biotin end group and diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA) chelators attached to the primary amines of the diethylenetriamine (DET) pendant groups of biotin-poly{N'-[N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethyl]aspartamide} [PAsp(DET)] and of biotin-poly{N'-[N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethyl]glutamide} [PGlu(DET)]. Like Asn-containing proteins and polypeptides, polyaspartamides undergo uncatalyzed degradation under model physiological conditions (10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl). We studied the uncatalyzed degradation of the polyaspartamide polymers by size exclusion chromatography and found that the degradation rate was sensitive to the nature of the pendant groups. The metal-free polymer underwent somewhat slower degradation than the corresponding polymers in which the DTPA groups were saturated with Eu(3+) or In(3+), but even after 14 days, substantial fractions of the polymers survived. We conclude that these polymers undergo negligible degradation on the time scale (24-48 h) of radioimmunotherapy treatment of tumors with (111)In. From a mechanistic perspective, we note that these degradation rates are on the order of the deamidation rates reported [J. Peptide Res. 2004, 63, 426] for Asn-containing pentapeptides, with half-times on the order of 10 days, but much slower than the rapid decay (hours) reported recently [Biomaterials 2010, 31, 3707] for poly{N'-[N-(2-aminoethyl)-2-aminoethyl]aspartamide} itself. This variation in degradation rate can be explained in terms of the influence of positive charges on the pendant group enhancing the acidity of the side-chain amide nitrogen of the aspartamide repeat unit. The DET pendant group is positively charged at pH 7, but in indium-loaded PAsp(DTPA) this charge is offset by the net negative charge of the DTPA-In complex.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".