Seismic Resistance of Fire-Damaged Reinforced Concrete Columns
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A study was carried out on the assessment of the residual strength and lateral/seismic load capacity of reinforced concrete columns after fire exposure. The mechanical properties of concrete after fire exposure, such as residual tension and compression strength, stiffness and constitutive responses, were reviewed. A nonlinear finite element analysis program, developed for three-dimensional reinforced concrete structures, was employed to estimate the post-fire axial and lateral performance of two full-scale reinforced concrete columns, tested previously at the National Research Council Canada. The results of the axial load-deformation response obtained from the analysis were compared and verified successfully with the test data. The lateral load and deformation responses of the specimens were then estimated using the numerical program. The results showed that both the lateral/seismic load capacity and ductility of the two reinforced concrete column specimens decreased noticeably due to the fire exposure. Studies are suggested on fire damage mitigation and post-fire shear strength recovery of reinforced concrete columns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it