MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319234722 · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.fbcr09-b59

Abstract B59: Role of Nf1 signaling in regulating pigmentation in the mouse

2009· article· en· W2319234722 on OpenAlexaff
Mugdha Deo, Helmut Fuchs, Martin H. Hrabe, Gregory S. Barsh, Catherine D. Van Raamsdonk

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMelanoma and MAPK Pathways
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurofibromin 1Microphthalmia-associated transcription factorMelanocyteDermisBiologyMelanocortin 1 receptorKnockout mouseGene knockinAlleleNeurofibromatosisCancer researchGeneticsCell biologyGeneAnatomyMelanomaTranscription factor

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is one of the most common autosomal dominantly inherited disorders affecting 1 in 3500 individuals. The NF1 gene encodes a protein called neurofibromin that has a Ras-GAP activity and acts as a tumor suppressor by negatively regulating Ras. Loss of neurofibromin has a pleiotropic effect affecting a number of cell types. We are interested in using the elegance and sensitivity of the pigmentary system to understand the mechanisms by which Nf1 regulates cell survival and proliferation in vivo. We have found that an ENU-induced point mutation (Nf1Dsk9) or a targeted knockout of one Nf1 allele specifically and uniformly darken the mouse skin dermis. The Endothelin receptor B (Ednrb) is essential for melanocyte (pigment producing cell) survival in the dermis between E10–E12.5. Since Nf1Dsk9 causes uniform hyper pigmentation of the dermis, we wanted to know whether Nf1Dsk9 depends on Ednrb signaling to cause dermal hyper pigmentation. In an attempt to understand the effect of homozygous loss of Nf1 on melanocytes, we knocked Nf1 out specifically in melanocytes. Methods: The Nf1Dsk9/+ mice were crossed to Ednrbs-l/s-l mice that have a complete deletion of the Ednrb gene. Pigmentation of the dermal tail skin and coat color spotting of 2–3 week old mice obtained from the above cross was quantified using ImageJ. A melanocyte-specific knockout of Nf1 was made in vivo in the mouse by crossing existing Mitf-Cre line to the floxed-Nf1 line. Pigmentation of the dermal tail skin was quantified using ImageJ. Results: A significant (p< 0.05, T-Test) hyper pigmentation of the dermis was observed in the Mitf-Cre/+; Nf1flox/flox homozygotes (now called Nf1mcko/mcko) with no change in epidermal pigmentation. In contrast to the Nf1Dsk9/+(germline heterozygote), the Nf1mcko/+ (melanocyte-specific knockout heterozygote) does not show dermal hyper pigmentation. Comparison of the tail dermis of Nf1Dsk9/+;Ednrbs-l/s-l mice with +/+;Ednrbs-l/s-l mice showed that Nf1Dsk9 was unable to give a dark dermis in the absence of Ednrb. However, the Nf1Dsk9/+;Ednrbs-l/s-l mice showed a significant (p< 0.05, T-Test) increase in the percentage of coat that was pigmented. Discussion: A significant darkening of the dermis in the Nf1mcko/mcko compared to wild type or Nf1mcko/+ littermates suggests a cell autonomous mechanism of dermal hyper pigmentation in the homozygote caused by the loss of Nf1 in melanocytes. The Nf1mcko/+ heterozygote does not show dermal hyper pigmentation, unlike the Nf1Dsk9/+ heterozygote. This suggests that the effect of loss of Nf1 in melanocytes acts in a non-cell autonomous mechanism in the heterozygote. The lack of dermal hyper pigmentation but an increased percentage of coat color spotting in the Nf1Dsk9/+;Ednrbs-l/s-l mice suggests that Nf1 regulates pigmentation by two independent mechanisms, one that depends on Ednrb and one that does not. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(23 Suppl):B59.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysFrench-language works237,207