Risk of myocardial infarction and ischaemic stroke in adults with polymyositis and dermatomyositis: a general population-based study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Limited data are available on the risk of cardiovascular disease in DM and PM. The purpose of this study was to estimate the risk of incident myocardial infarction (MI) and ischaemic stroke in adults with incident PM/DM at the general population level. METHODS: We assembled a retrospective cohort of all adults with incident PM/DM in British Columbia, and we matched up to 10 adults randomly selected from the general population. We estimated the incidence rates (IRs) per 1000 person-years for MI and stroke. We calculated hazard ratios (HRs), adjusting for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 774 new cases of inflammatory myopathies, 424 had PM (59% female, mean age 60 years) and 350 had DM (65% female, mean age 56 years). IRs for MI and stroke in PM were 22.52 and 10.15 events per 1000 person-years, respectively, vs 5.50 and 5.58 events in the comparison cohort, respectively. Fully adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 3.89 (95% CI: 2.28, 6.65) for MI and 1.76 (95% CI: 0.91, 3.40) for stroke. The age-, sex- and entry time-matched HRs for MI and stroke were highest in the first year after PM diagnosis (6.51, [95% CI: 3.15, 13.47] and 3.48 [95% CI: 1.26, 9.62], respectively). Similar trends were seen for DM. CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that PM and DM are both associated with an increased risk of MI but not ischaemic stroke. Our findings support increased vigilance in cardiovascular prevention, surveillance and risk modification in adults with PM and DM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".