MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319270329 · doi:10.1139/g11-029

Sequence context for transcription and translation of the Arabidopsis<i>RPL23aA</i>and<i>RPL23aB</i>paralogs

2011· article· en· W2319270329 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Kerri B. McIntosh, Rory F. Degenhardt, Peta C. Bonham‐Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Molecular Biology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyArabidopsisGeneticsIntronRibosomeRibosome biogenesisRibosomal RNAGeneRNACell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The 80S cytoplasmic ribosome is responsible for translating the transcriptome into the proteome. Demand for ribosome production depends on growth rate, and both the ribosomal RNA (rRNA) and ribosomal protein (RP) components must respond coordinately and rapidly to positive and negative growth stimuli to prevent deleterious effects of excess or insufficient subunits. The 81 RPs of the Arabidopsis 80S ribosome are encoded by multigene families that often exhibit overlapping patterns of transcript accumulation; however, only one isoform of each RP family (with the exception of a small number of acidic RPs) assembles into a single ribosome. Here we dissected the regulatory regions (RRs) of both members of the RPL23a family (RPL23aA and RPL23aB) to identify salient cis-acting elements involved in transcriptional, posttranscriptional, and translational regulation of expression. Full length and truncated RRs of RPL23a paralogs were cloned upstream of a GUS reporter gene and expressed in Arabidopsis transgenic plants. High level expression in mitotically active tissues, driven by RPL23aA and RPL23aB RRs, required TATA-box, telo-box, and site II motif elements. First and second introns were found to play a minor role in posttranscriptional regulation of paralogs, and conserved transcript features (e.g., UTR base composition) may be involved in enhancing translational efficiency. Overall, our results indicate that RPL23a expression is governed by a complex network of multiple regulatory layers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.155 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2011
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenomeSame topicPlant Molecular Biology ResearchFrench-language works237,207