Lipid Selectivity, Orientation, and Extent of Membrane Binding of Nonacylated RP2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Retinitis pigmentosa 2 (RP2) is an ubiquitary protein of 350 residues. The N-terminus of RP2 contains putative sites of myristoylation and palmitoylation. The dually acylated protein is predominantly localized to the plasma membrane. However, clinically occurring substitution mutations of RP2 in photoreceptors lead to the expression of a nonacylated protein, which was shown to be misrouted to intracellular organelles using different cell lines. However, the parameters responsible for the modulation of the membrane binding of nonacylated RP2 (naRP2) are still largely unknown. The maximal insertion pressure of naRP2 has thus been determined after its injection into the subphase underneath monolayers of phospholipids, which are typical of photoreceptor membranes. These data demonstrated that naRP2 shows a preferential binding to saturated phospholipid monolayers. Moreover, polarization modulation infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy has allowed comparison of the secondary structure of this protein in solution and upon binding to phospholipid monolayers. In addition, simulations of these spectra have allowed to determine that the β-helix of naRP2 has an orientation of 60° with respect to the normal, which remains unchanged regardless of the type of phospholipid. Finally, ellipsometric measurements of naRP2 demonstrated that its particular affinity for saturated phospholipids can be explained by its larger extent of insertion in this phospholipid monolayer compared to that in polyunsaturated phospholipid monolayers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".