MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319300256 · doi:10.1103/physreve.91.022301

Inherent structures, fragility, and jamming: Insights from quasi-one-dimensional hard disks

2015· article· en· W2319300256 on OpenAlexafffund
Mahdi Zaeifi Yamchi, Sarah Ashwin, Richard K. Bowles

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review E · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsJammingPhysicsFragilityIsobaric processStatistical physicsVolume fractionPerfect fluidThermodynamicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study a quasi-one-dimensional system of hard disks confined between hard lines to explore the relationship between the inherent structure landscape, the thermodynamics, and the dynamics of the fluid. The transfer matrix method is used to obtain an exact description of the landscape, equation of state, and provide a mapping of configurations of the equilibrium fluid to their local jammed structures. This allows us to follow how the system samples the landscape as a function of occupied volume fraction ϕ. Configurations of the ideal gas map to the maximum in the distribution of inherent structures, with a jamming volume fraction ϕ(J)(*), and sample more dense basins with increasing ϕ. This suggests jammed states with a density below ϕ(J)(*) are inaccessible from the equilibrium fluid. The configurational entropy of the fluid decreases rapidly at intermediate ϕ before plateauing at a low value and going to zero as the most dense packing is approached. This leads to the appearance of a maximum in both the isobaric heat capacity and the inherent structure pressure. We also show that the system exhibits a crossover from fragile to strong fluid behavior, located at the heat capacity maximum. Structural relaxation in the fragile fluid is shown to be controlled by the presence of high order saddle points caused by neighboring defects that are unstable with respect to jamming and spontaneously rearrange to form a stable local environment. In the strong fluid, the defect concentration is low so that defects do not interact and relaxation occurs through the hopping of isolated defects between stable local packing environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ESame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207