Relationship between addiction to cellular phone and psychological stress among female Japanese college and Korean university students.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective : This paper considers the differences in the relationship between the dependence on cellular phone and stress among female Japanese college students and Korean university students.Method : A self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted on the cellular phone dependence and stress among 159 female students in a Japanese college and 85 female students in a Korean university. The applied questionnaires were the cellular phone dependence questionnaire (CPDQ) designed by Toda et al. (2004) and the stress survey questionnaire designed by Canadian Institute of stress and Hans Selye foundation (2005).Results : Both among Japanese and Korean students, frequencies of mail exchange among the students scored higher than 42 points as a results of a CDPQ survey, were significantly more than those among the students scored lower than 42 points (P<0.01), time for mailing and time for call in the students scored higher than 42 points were significantly longer than those in the students scored lower than 42 points (P<0.01). Only among Japanese students, scores of stress in the students scored higher than 42 points (6.4±4.1 points) were significantly higher than those in the students scored lower than 42 points (4.6±3.3 points) (P<0.05).Conclusion : On the basis of the results obtained, it could be concluded that a relationship between cellular phone dependence and stress is more likely to be seen among Japanese students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".