Copper stress and filamentous fungus<i>Humicola lutea</i>103 — ultrastructural changes and activities of key metabolic enzymes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Humicola lutea 103 is a copper-tolerant fungal strain able to grow in the presence of 300 μg·mL(-1) Cu(2+) under submerged cultivation. To prevent the consequences of copper overload, microorganisms have evolved molecular mechanisms that regulate its uptake, intracellular traffic, storage, and efflux. In spite of this avoidance strategy, high heavy-metal concentrations caused distinct and widespread ultrastructural alterations in H. lutea. The mitochondria were the first and main target of the toxic action. The effect of copper on activities of the key enzymes (hexokinase, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, malate dehydrogenase, and isocitrate dehydrogenase) included in the 3 main metabolic pathways, glycolysis, pentose phosphate pathway, and tricarboxylic acid cycle, was investigated. High metal concentrations exhibited a dramatic negative effect on hexokinase, while the other 3 enzymes showed a significant and dose-dependent stimulation. On the basis of the present and previous results we concluded that the copper-induced oxidative stress plays an important role in the fungal tolerance to high Cu (2+) concentrations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".