High-Temperature Devices and Environmental Cells Designed for X-ray and Neutron Diffraction Experiments
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| January 01, 2000 High-Temperature Devices and Environmental Cells Designed for X-ray and Neutron Diffraction Experiments Ronald C. Peterson; Ronald C. Peterson Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Hexiong Yang Hexiong Yang Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road, NW, Washington, DC 20015 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Ronald C. Peterson Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada Hexiong Yang Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road, NW, Washington, DC 20015 Publisher: Mineralogical Society of America First Online: 09 Mar 2017 © 2000 Mineralogical Society of America Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry (2000) 41 (1): 425–443. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2000.41.13 Article history First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Ronald C. Peterson, Hexiong Yang; High-Temperature Devices and Environmental Cells Designed for X-ray and Neutron Diffraction Experiments. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 2000;; 41 (1): 425–443. doi: https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2000.41.13 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Search Advanced Search Knowledge of crystal structures at high temperatures is essential for our understanding of energetics, processes, and behavior of solid state materials. It is of particular importance in geophysics, because most mineralogical processes take place at conditions other than in air at room temperature. In order to study these mineralogical processes under conditions relevant to nature or to maintain the oxidation state or stability of a phase during study, scientists have designed various furnaces and environmental cells. Much of the early development of high-temperature devices for powder diffraction studies took place during the 1960s. Most of the construction materials we use... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.018 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".