MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319405449 · doi:10.2138/rmg.2000.41.13

High-Temperature Devices and Environmental Cells Designed for X-ray and Neutron Diffraction Experiments

2000· article· en· W2319405449 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicX-ray Diffraction in Crystallography
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceIconDownloadGeological surveyGeologyComputer scienceWorld Wide WebPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research Article| January 01, 2000 High-Temperature Devices and Environmental Cells Designed for X-ray and Neutron Diffraction Experiments Ronald C. Peterson; Ronald C. Peterson Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Hexiong Yang Hexiong Yang Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road, NW, Washington, DC 20015 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Ronald C. Peterson Department of Geological Sciences and Geological Engineering, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada Hexiong Yang Geophysical Laboratory, Carnegie Institution of Washington, 5251 Broad Branch Road, NW, Washington, DC 20015 Publisher: Mineralogical Society of America First Online: 09 Mar 2017 © 2000 Mineralogical Society of America Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry (2000) 41 (1): 425–443. https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2000.41.13 Article history First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Ronald C. Peterson, Hexiong Yang; High-Temperature Devices and Environmental Cells Designed for X-ray and Neutron Diffraction Experiments. Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry 2000;; 41 (1): 425–443. doi: https://doi.org/10.2138/rmg.2000.41.13 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyReviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry Search Advanced Search Knowledge of crystal structures at high temperatures is essential for our understanding of energetics, processes, and behavior of solid state materials. It is of particular importance in geophysics, because most mineralogical processes take place at conditions other than in air at room temperature. In order to study these mineralogical processes under conditions relevant to nature or to maintain the oxidation state or stability of a phase during study, scientists have designed various furnaces and environmental cells. Much of the early development of high-temperature devices for powder diffraction studies took place during the 1960s. Most of the construction materials we use... You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.707

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it