Views of Iranian prison staff towards needle-exchange program in prison
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aims: Prison staff members have a core role in the provision of harm reduction strategies in prison. This study aimed to evaluate the attitudes of prison directors, managers and health staff toward Needle Exchange Program (NEP) among people who inject drugs in Iranian prisons. Methods: With a grounded theory design, this qualitative study was conducted in 2011 in Iran. The study population included directors of provincial prison organisations, prison managers, heads of health departments in prisons, prison health officers, physicians, counsellors and healthcare workers in prisons. Participants’ responses were collected via focus group discussions. Results: Attitudes of the participants could generally be categorised in three including: Health-related aspects; Behavioural and social aspects; and Legal, organisational and financial aspects. Those who were in line with the existence of NEP in prisons mentioned some pre-requisites for supporting this program in prisons. Conclusion: Positive and negative views of Iranian prison staff toward NEP in prisons suggest that there are many obstacles to the provision of harm reduction strategies in prison. Consideration of socio-cultural parameters of the target community as well as combination of NEP and other harm reduction strategies might help to improve the effectiveness of harm reduction in prisons.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".