Heat recovery with low temperature spray drying for thermochemical hydrogen production
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the heat transfer and evaporative drying of molten salt droplets in a thermochemical copper-chlorine (Cu-Cl) cycle of hydrogen production.An aqueous CuCl 2 stream exiting from an electrochemical cell is preheated to 150°C, before entering the flash dryer to produce solid CuCl 2 (s).The device must add sufficient heat to remove water and recover solid CuCl 2 .New innovations of heat recovery aim to develop alternatives to reduce costs and improve efficiency of the evaporation process for CuCl 2 particle production.This includes a new method to pressurize the liquid stream sufficiently to atomize droplets through a pressure-reducing nozzle in the spray system, thereby enhancing the device's performance.The liquid phase flashes due to a sudden pressure drop.Unlike other thermochemical cycles, the Cu-Cl cycle can take unique advantage of low-grade waste heat for spray drying and vaporizing processes at low temperatures.The powder produced by spray drying is then injected in a fluidized reactor to eventually produce hydrogen.A common byproduct of manufacturing processes, incinerators, industrial furnaces, etc.heat -can become a valuable resource through its utility for hydrogen production with the Cu-Cl cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".