Bibliographic record
Abstract
MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 546:147-161 (2016) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11620 Demographic responses of coexisting species to in situ warming Rebecca L. Kordas1,2,*, Christopher D. G. Harley1 1University of British Columbia, 6270 University Blvd, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 Canada 2Present address: Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Rd, Ascot, SL5 7PY, UK *Corresponding author: r.kordas@imperial.ac.uk ABSTRACT: Climate warming may drive organismal body temperatures beyond important physiological thresholds, ultimately leading to detrimental effects on populations and communities. Much of what we currently know about species responses to warming has come from correlations with weather patterns or laboratory experiments, which can lack mechanism and realism, respectively. We incorporated both of these properties into warming experiments by manipulating substratum temperature in situ, using passively warmed black and white settlement plates. We monitored vital rates of coexisting barnacles over 1 yr at mid- and high shore levels of the rocky intertidal on Salt Spring Island (British Columbia, Canada), a 'hot spot' for intertidal thermal stress. Warming by ~2°C negatively affected the vital rates and population sizes of both barnacle species; however, survival of the competitive dominant, Balanus glandula, was more severely affected than that of Chthamalus dalli, leading to a temperature-induced change in relative space occupancy in the mid intertidal. Survival of B. glandula was reduced by 38–97%, leading to a 94–95% reduction in space occupancy, depending on shore level. C. dalli survival was also reduced by warming (10-44%), leading to a 63–73% reduction in space occupancy. Further, growth rates of both species were lower (16-50%) in warm treatments than in cool treatments, resulting in smaller adult body sizes, which can cause delays in reproductive maturity. Experiments like this one, which manipulate warming in the field on multiple species across ontogeny, will further enhance our understanding of the ecological effects of climate change. KEY WORDS: Climate change · Temperature · barnacles · Growth rate · Survival · Population · Ontogeny Full text in pdf format Supplementary material PreviousNextCite this article as: Kordas RL, Harley CDG (2016) Demographic responses of coexisting species to in situ warming. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 546:147-161. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps11620 Export citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 546. Online publication date: March 21, 2016 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2016 Inter-Research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".