MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319483469 · doi:10.1111/rsr.12362

The Divine Eye and the Diaspora: Vietnamese Syncretism Becomes Transpacific Caodaism By JanetAlison Hoskins. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 2015. Pp. xviii + 283. Cloth, $65.00; paper, $32.00.

2016· article· en· W2319483469 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lukáš Pokorný

Bibliographic record

VenueReligious Studies Review · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicVietnamese History and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiasporaSyncretism (linguistics)Religious studiesHistoryVietnameseScholarshipGender studiesAnthropologySociologyTheologyPolitical scienceLawPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Established in 1926, Cao Đài (officially, Đại Đạo Tam Kỳ Phổ Độ) belongs to Vietnam's largest religious traditions today with an estimated four to five million followers, a large part of whom are formally affiliated with the Tây Ninh denomination. Next to its growing domestic membership, Cao Đài experiences a sizeable diasporic presence, mainly in Cambodia, the United States (California), Australia, Canada, and France. Hoskins, a professor of anthropology and religion at the University of Southern California, has been a prolific contributor to Cao Đài studies over the last decade. Her scholarship culminates in this copious examination of Cao Đài in past and present times. Centering on the notion of “Transpacific religion,” Hoskins pairs the biographical profiles of five founding generation adherents with those of their diasporic successors, also depicting the wider contexts of both. In doing so, she skillfully weaves a brilliantly engaging narrative, outlining the complex history and nature of this movement in Vietnam and overseas. Under the ethnically demoralizing impact of French colonial rule, Cao Đài was formed as a religion with ab ovo diasporic doctrinal identity—a “religion of decolonization”—utilizing syncretism (“explicit syncretism”) as a means to create moral equity, religiously retrieve and canonize national consciousness/ethnic pride, and gain religious recognition and secular respect. Hoskins is especially intrigued by what she notes as the international community's shift from a “religion in diaspora” to a “religion of diaspora,” a shift that closes the circle, namely that between Cao Đài's “age of revelations” (1925–1934) and the “age of diaspora” (since 1975). This is an essential reading for the student of Vietnamese religions and those dealing with East Asian new religious movements in general.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.107

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReligious Studies ReviewSame topicVietnamese History and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207