The Divine Eye and the Diaspora: Vietnamese Syncretism Becomes Transpacific Caodaism By JanetAlison Hoskins. Honolulu: University of Hawai'i Press, 2015. Pp. xviii + 283. Cloth, $65.00; paper, $32.00.
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Established in 1926, Cao Đài (officially, Đại Đạo Tam Kỳ Phổ Độ) belongs to Vietnam's largest religious traditions today with an estimated four to five million followers, a large part of whom are formally affiliated with the Tây Ninh denomination. Next to its growing domestic membership, Cao Đài experiences a sizeable diasporic presence, mainly in Cambodia, the United States (California), Australia, Canada, and France. Hoskins, a professor of anthropology and religion at the University of Southern California, has been a prolific contributor to Cao Đài studies over the last decade. Her scholarship culminates in this copious examination of Cao Đài in past and present times. Centering on the notion of “Transpacific religion,” Hoskins pairs the biographical profiles of five founding generation adherents with those of their diasporic successors, also depicting the wider contexts of both. In doing so, she skillfully weaves a brilliantly engaging narrative, outlining the complex history and nature of this movement in Vietnam and overseas. Under the ethnically demoralizing impact of French colonial rule, Cao Đài was formed as a religion with ab ovo diasporic doctrinal identity—a “religion of decolonization”—utilizing syncretism (“explicit syncretism”) as a means to create moral equity, religiously retrieve and canonize national consciousness/ethnic pride, and gain religious recognition and secular respect. Hoskins is especially intrigued by what she notes as the international community's shift from a “religion in diaspora” to a “religion of diaspora,” a shift that closes the circle, namely that between Cao Đài's “age of revelations” (1925–1934) and the “age of diaspora” (since 1975). This is an essential reading for the student of Vietnamese religions and those dealing with East Asian new religious movements in general.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it