MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319498730 · doi:10.1021/jp1092948

X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy of Functionalized Silicon Nanocrystals

2010· article· en· W2319498730 on OpenAlexafffund
Joel A. Kelly, Eric J. Henderson, Rhett J. Clark, Colin M. Hessel, Ronald G. Cavell, Jonathan G. C. Veinot

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSilicon Nanostructures and Photoluminescence
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPhotoluminescenceHydrosilylationHydrogen silsesquioxaneMaterials scienceSiliconAbsorption (acoustics)SpectroscopyLuminescencePhotochemistryPotential wellAbsorption spectroscopyAbsorption edgeNanocrystalExcited stateX-ray absorption fine structureQuantum dotThermal oxidationHydrofluoric acidX-ray photoelectron spectroscopySilsesquioxaneOptoelectronicsNanotechnologyChemistryChemical engineeringOpticsOrganic chemistryPolymerBand gapCatalysisAtomic physicsElectron-beam lithography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an X-ray absorption spectroscopic study of the optical and electronic properties of freestanding, alkyl-functionalized silicon nanocrystals (Si-NCs). These materials were derived from thermal processing of hydrogen silsesquioxane, subsequently etched with hydrofluoric acid and functionalized via photochemical hydrosilylation with alkenes. These materials are of interest for their size-dependent photoluminescence (PL), that spans the visible and near-IR regions. Using near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure spectroscopy and X-ray excited optical luminescence, we have investigated the impact of quantum confinement effects and surface species on the Si-NC PL. These materials exhibit PL found to be consistent with the quantum confinement model; however, ambient oxidation was proposed to strongly influence the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicSilicon Nanostructures and PhotoluminescenceFrench-language works237,207