Synthesis and Characterization of Heterobimetallic (Pd/B) Nindigo Complexes and Comparisons to Their Homobimetallic (Pd<sub>2</sub>, B<sub>2</sub>) Analogues
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reactions of Nindigo-BF2 complexes with Pd(hfac)2 produced mixed complexes with Nindigo binding to both a BF2 and a Pd(hfac) unit. These complexes are the first in which the Nindigo ligand binds two different substrates, and provide a conceptual link between previously reported bis(BF2) and bis(Pd(hfac)) complexes. The new Pd/B complexes have intense near IR absorption near 820 nm, and they undergo multiple reversible oxidations and reductions as probed by cyclic voltammetry experiments. The spectral, redox, and structural properties of these complexes are compared against those of the corresponding B2 and Pd2 complexes with the aid of time-dependent density functional calculations. In all cases the low-energy electronic transitions are ligand-centered π-π* transitions, but the highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) and lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) energies--and hence the absorption wavelength as well as the oxidation and reduction potentials--are significantly modulated by the moieties bound to the Nindigo ligand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".