MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319599348 · doi:10.1109/tcpmt.2014.2377375

Capacitance and Conductance of Through Silicon Vias With Consideration of Multilayer Media and Different Shapes

2015· article· en· W2319599348 on OpenAlexaff
Sheng Liu, Wanchun Tang, Wei Zhuang, Gui Wang, Y.L. Chow

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing Technology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topic3D IC and TSV technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitanceConductanceMaterials scienceRADIUSSiliconOptoelectronicsAcousticsOpticsPhysicsCondensed matter physicsComputer scienceElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper evaluates the capacitance and conductance of the through silicon vias (TSVs) with consideration of the multilayer media along the vertical direction and different shapes. According to the moment method, the capacitance and conductance of the straight and two types of tapered TSVs are calculated and compared with those of the conventional 2-D method. It is shown that the capacitance calculated by the 2-D method for the straight TSVs will produce a large error when the radius and pitch of the TSVs become larger. For the two types of tapered TSVs, their capacitance decreases with the increase in the slop angle and the pitch due to less surface area and capacitance coupling, respectively. Therefore, the tapered TSVs with larger slop angle and pitch are beneficial to reduce the propagation delay. With the increase in the pitch, the conductance of both the straight and the tapered TSVs increases slightly at low frequency, while it decreases at high frequency. All the results by the method in this paper agree well with those of the electromagnetic simulations up to 40 GHz.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Components Packaging and Manufacturing TechnologySame topic3D IC and TSV technologiesFrench-language works237,207