MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2319605073 · doi:10.2514/6.2015-0459

Full Scale Aircraft Drop Test Program for the F-35C Carrier Variant

2015· article· en· W2319605073 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue56th AIAA/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Measurement and Detection Methods
Canadian institutionsLockheed Martin (Canada)
FundersU.S. Geological Survey
KeywordsScale (ratio)Drop (telecommunication)Test (biology)Computer sciencePhysicsTelecommunicationsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is a three variant family of singleseat, single-engine, all-weather, stealth multirole fighter aircraft currently in production for multiple US armed services and partner countries. The F-35C is the carrier variant design of the three variant family. Drop testing of a full scale structurally complete aircraft is required for verifying compliance with the US Navy structural integrity and flight certification requirements for the F-35C carrier variant aircraft. The US Navy also requires a full scale drop test prior to clearing the aircraft to conduct high sink rate landings in flight test. The drop test program consisted of simulated shipboard landings for a variety of design touchdown conditions at specified aircraft attitudes, sink rates, and aircraft store configurations. The test objectives were to: (1) verify that structural integrity and functional design requirements for shipboard landing impacts have been met; and (2) collect loads and dynamics response data for correlation with analytical predictions. The F-35C drop test program successfully completed a total of 47 simulated shipboard landings without any structural failures and with good correlation between measured and predicted loads. The drop test results were used to clear the F-35C aircraft for shore-based carrier suitability flight testing and initial shipboard trials. Nomenclature 3PE Three-Point Attitude, E configuration PLC Programmable Logic Control AC Aircraft RPM Revolutions Per Minute CF-3 F-35C flight test aircraft SDD Systems Development & Demonstration CG Center of Gravity SPHM Structural Prognostic Health Monitoring CG-1 F-35C drop test article STOVL Short Takeoff and Vertical Landing CLDGW Carrier Landing Design Gross Weight USG United States Government CV Carrier Variant USN US Navy CTOL Conventional Takeoff and Landing VPC Vertical and Pitch, C configuration DAS Data Acquisition System VPD Vertical and Pitch, D configuration EOTS Electro-Optical Targeting System VRB Vertical and Roll, B configuration FFE Free Flight Engagement VRC Vertical and Roll, C configuration IPP Integrated Power Pack VRD Vertical and Roll, D configuration MLG Main Landing Gear VVA Vertical Velocity, A configuration NLG Nose Landing Gear WB Weapons Bay

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.620
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it