MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

GAIT PARAMETERS ASSOCIATED WITH RESPONSIVENESS TO A TASK-SPECIFIC AND/OR STRENGTH TRAINING PROGRAM POST-STROKE.

2005· article· en· W2319738463 on OpenAlexaff
Tara D. Klassen, Sara J. Mulroy, Katherine J. Sullivan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurologic Physical Therapy · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsVancouver Coastal Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMediusPhysical medicine and rehabilitationStroke (engine)RehabilitationPhysical therapyMedicineKinematicsGaitTreadmillVastus medialisElectromyographyWeaknessGait trainingSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose/Hypothesis: After stroke, patients exhibit weakness that contributes to decreased walking velocity and increased disability. While evidence exists that patient's post-stroke respond to task-specific and strength training programs, it is not clear which biomechanical parameters of gait are most influential in improved walking outcome. The purpose of this study was to identify the gait parameters associated with responsiveness to a task-specific and/or strength training program designed to improve locomotor recovery. Number of Subjects: 20 subjects, ranging from 4 to 60 months post-stroke. Materials/Methods: Subjects completed one of four training regimens consisting of a combination of two of the following: body weight supported treadmill training; lower extremity (LE) resisted cycling, progressive resistive LE strengthening, or a sham condition (arm ergometry). Each subject received 24 treatment sessions (1 hour/day; 4x/week; 6 weeks), and the exercises were alternated each day. Subjects ambulated at a self-selected velocity across a 10-meter walkway using customary assistive devices, but no lower extremity orthoses, both at baseline and post intervention. Kinematics and kinetics of the hemiparetic LE were recorded with a VICON motion system and a Kistler force plate. Electromyographic activity was recording using indwelling, fine wire electrodes in soleus, anterior tibialis, vastus intermedius, rectus femoris, semi-membranosus, adductor longus, gluteus maximus and gluteus medius. Changes in LE kinematics, kinetics, and muscle activation intensities for the 10 subjects with the greatest increase in velocity (HI group) were compared with those of subjects with less improvement (LO group) using an independent T-test with a p value of < .05. Results: Velocity increased after intervention by 0.144 m/sec with the HI group vs. 0.016 m/sec with the LO group. Subjects in the HI group displayed greater increases of preswing ankle plantarflexion angle [+3.8 deg vs −0.2 deg], ankle plantarflexion power [+0.248 W/kgm vs +0.031 W/kgm], terminal stance hip extension angle [+5.8 deg vs −0.7deg], hip flexor moment [+0.154 Nm/kgm vs −.031 Nm/kgm], and hip flexor power [+0.188 W/kgm vs 0.006 W/kgm]. Furthermore, intensity of soleus activation was also significantly greater in the HI group subjects after the intervention [15%max vs 0.3%max]. Conclusions: Increased activation of soleus, promoting an improvement of the trailing limb posture, combined with changes in hip and ankle bio-mechanics during terminal stance and pre-swing, were associated with the greatest increase in gait velocity in individuals post-stroke that completed a task-specific and/or strength training program designed to improve loco-motor recovery. Clinical Relevance: Biomechanical analyses can be an effective tool for understanding the mechanisms that underlie responsiveness to physical therapy interventions, therefore allowing a more targeted approach to ameliorating impairments to function. Supported by The Foundation for Physical Therapy as part of PT ClinResNet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.766
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurologic Physical TherapySame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207