Surgery for Primary Hyperparathyroidism
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine parathyroidectomy (PTx) rates in patients who satisfy the consensus guidelines for surgical treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT). BACKGROUND: Surgery for PHPT is recommended for all symptomatic patients and select asymptomatic patients meeting established consensus criteria. Adherence to the consensus guidelines has not been examined systematically, because of inadequate information regarding patients managed nonoperatively. METHODS: All nonuremic patients with PHPT during the period 1995-2008 were identified using the Kaiser Permanente-Southern California laboratory database, encompassing 3.5 million individuals annually. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine predictors of PTx. RESULTS: We found 3388 patients with PHPT, of whom 265 (8%) were symptomatic (nephrolithiasis). Nephrolithiasis was predictive of PTx (OR 2.94 vs asymptomatic), with 51% of symptomatic patients undergoing surgery. Among asymptomatic patients, the proportion meeting consensus criteria was 39% during the early period (1995-2002) and 51% during the late period (2003-2008). The PTx rate for these patients exceeded that for asymptomatic patients not meeting consensus criteria but remained low (early 44% vs 19%, P < 0.0001; late 39% vs 16%, P < 0.0001). The following individual criteria were predictive of PTx: calcium >11.5 mg/dL (OR 2.27), hypercalciuria (OR 3.28, P < 0.0001), and age < 50 years (OR 1.54, P < 0.0001). However, the absolute PTx rates associated with satisfaction of these criteria were in the 50% range. Bone density scores did not influence likelihood of PTx and renal impairment predicted against PTx (OR 0.35, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The consensus guidelines regarding PHPT have not been followed in our study population. PTx appears to be underutilized in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".