Synthesis, Characterization, and Activity of Yttrium(III) Nitrate Complexes Bearing Tripodal Phosphine Oxide and Mixed Phosphine–Phosphine Oxide Ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of four tripodal phosphine oxide ligands, (OPR(2))(2)CHCH(2)POR(2) (1a-1d), and four mixed phosphine-phosphine oxide ligands, (OPR(2))(2)CHCH(2)PR(2) (3a-3d), were synthesized and coordinated to yttrium to produce Y(NO(3))(3)[(OPR(2))(2)CHCH(2)POR(2)] (2a-2d) and Y(NO(3))(3)[(OPR(2))(2)CHCH(2)PR(2)](OPPh(3)) (4a-4d) complexes. The previously reported ligand 1a and unknown phosphine oxide ligands 1b-1d were generated in an unprecedented trisubstitution reaction of bromoacetaldehyde diethyl acetal, while the novel partially reduced ligands 3a-3d were synthesized from 1a-1d according to a known literature protocol for the selective monoreduction of bisphosphine oxides. The neutral yttrium complexes 2a-2d are nine-coordinate and display a tricapped trigonal-prismatic geometry. Complexes 4a-4d are also neutral, nine-coordinate species and have a pendant phosphine functionality, which provides the potential to form bimetallic early-late transition-metal complexes. Additionally, yttrium complexes 2a-2d were activated with base and tested for the ring-opening polymerization of ε-caprolactone, but the results showed that base by itself was significantly more effective than the yttrium species investigated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".