MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Adalimumab therapy reduces hospitalization and Colectomy rates in patients with Ulcerative Colitis: Data from controlled trials

2011· article· en· W2319816543 on OpenAlexaff
Brian G. Feagan, William J. Sandborn, Mei Yang, Kathleen G. Lomax, Andreas Lazar, Roopal Thakkar, Parvez Mulani, Jingdong Chao

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUlcerative colitisAdalimumabMedicineColectomyInternal medicinePlaceboGastroenterologyClinical trialColitisTumor necrosis factor alphaDiseasePathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The efficacy and safety of adalimumab (ADA) for the induction and maintenance of clinical remission in patients with moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC) was demonstrated in 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (M06-826 and M06-827). We assessed the effect of ADA on the risk reduction of all-cause and UC-related hospitalization and colectomy in these 2 trials. Patients in the 160-/80-mg induction (N=223) and placebo (N=222) arms of M06-826 and patients in the ADA (N=248) and placebo (N=246) arms of M06-827 were combined into a single dataset (N=939). Hospitalization (all-cause and UC-related) and colectomy events were based on serious adverse event reports reviewed by 2 gastroenterologists who were blinded to the treatment groups. The risk of hospitalization was compared between the treatment arms using person-year (PY)-based incidence rates (IRs). Z-scores with confidence intervals were used to determine the statistical difference between treatment groups.1 The number of hospitalizations was compared with Poisson regression with time offset. The table summarizes the hospitalization and colectomy IRs. A 33% reduction in the percentage of patients hospitalized for any reason and a 35% reduction in the number of all-cause hospitalizations were observed with ADA treatment vs. placebo (p<0.05 for both comparisons). When UC-related hospitalizations were compared, the reductions for hospitalization rate (45%) and number of hospitalizations (48%) were both statistically significant. Rates of colectomy were numerically lower in the ADA group compared with the placebo group, representing a 22% reduction. ADA-treated patients had a significantly lower risk for UC-related and all cause hospitalization compared with placebo-treated patients. In addition, a numerically lower colectomy rate in patients receiving ADA therapy vs. placebo was observed. These data support a favorable benefit/risk profile of ADA in UC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207