MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The impact of clinically significant upper gastrointestinal bleeding acquired in a pediatric intensive care unit

2001· article· en· W2319831042 on OpenAlexaffabout
France Gauvin, Marc-André Dugas, M Chaïbou, Sylvain Morneau, Denis Lebel, Jacques Lacroix

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Critical Care Medicine · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNosocomial Infections in ICU
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUpper gastrointestinal bleedingIntensive care unitCoagulopathyPediatric intensive care unitProspective cohort studyBlood transfusionCohort studyCohortSurgeryInternal medicineIntensive care medicineEndoscopy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical and economic impact attributable to upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) acquired in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). DESIGN: Prospective case-control-within-cohort study. SETTING: PICU at a university hospital. PATIENTS: All consecutive patients over a 1-yr period. METHODS: All UGIB (hematemesis or blood in gastric tube) were reported. A UGIB was qualified as clinically significant (CS-UGIB) if a panel of reviewers assessed that a complication (decreased hemoglobin concentration, transfusion, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, surgery, or death) was attributed to it. A UGIB was qualified as clinically nonsignificant (NS-UGIB) if none of these complications was attributed to it. The Ø-UGIB group comprised patients without UGIB. Pairing between the three groups was done according to these criteria: death or survival, Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score on admission, respiratory failure, coagulopathy, and age. Data considered for the impact analysis was prospectively monitored during the stay in PICU. Costs were estimated in Canadian dollars (1999) as follows: costs of stay + medical staff + ventilation + red blood cell transfusions. RESULTS: The cohort included 1006 admissions. Sixteen cases of CS-UGIB were paired to 13 cases of NS-UGIB and 32 cases of Ø-UGIB. Compared with the Ø-UGIB group and the NS-UGIB group, the CS-UGIB group showed a significantly (p < 0.05) higher rate of red blood cell transfusions, duration of ventilation, length of stay in PICU, and a lower hemoglobin level. There was no difference between the NS-UGIB group and the Ø-UGIB group. The cost analysis demonstrated a significant difference (p < 0.05) between the CS-UGIB group (20,062.67 Can dollars/patient per stay) and the other groups (NS-UGIB, 6104.77 Can dollars/patient per stay; Ø-UGIB, 5457.25 Can dollars/patient per stay). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates a significant clinical and economic impact of CS-UGIB in PICU, although no impact was detected for NS-UGIB. Further studies on the benefit of UGIB prophylaxis for critically ill children with risk factors for CS-UGIB are needed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.401
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2001
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePediatric Critical Care MedicineSame topicNosocomial Infections in ICUFrench-language works237,207