Catalytic and Stoichiometric Reactivity of β-Silylamido Agostic Complex of Mo: Intermediacy of a Silanimine Complex and Applications to Multicomponent Coupling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reaction of complex (ArN═)(2)Mo(PMe(3))(3) (Ar = 2,6-diisopropylphenyl) with PhSiH(3) gives the β-agostic NSi-H···M silyamido complex (ArN═)Mo(SiH(2)Ph)(PMe(3))(η(3)-ArN-SiHPh-H) (3) as the first product. 3 decomposes in the mother liquor to a mixture of hydride compounds, including complex {η(3)-SiH(Ph)-N(Ar)-SiHPh-H···}MoH(3)(PMe(3))(3) characterized by NMR. Compound 3 was obtained on preparative scale by reacting (ArN═)(2)Mo(PMe(3))(3) with 2 equiv of PhSiH(3) under N(2) purging and characterized by multinuclear NMR, IR, and X-ray diffraction. Analogous reaction of (Ar'N═)(2)Mo(PMe(3))(3) (Ar' = 2,6-dimethylphenyl) with PhSiH(3) affords the nonagostic silylamido derivative (Ar'N═)Mo(SiH(2)Ph)(PMe(3))(2)(NAr'{SiH(2)Ph}) (5) as the first product. 5 decomposes in the mother liquor to a mixture of {η(3)-PhHSi-N(Ar')-SiHPh-H···}MoH(3)(PMe(3))(3), (Ar'N═)Mo(H)(2)(PMe(3))(2)(η(2)-Ar'N═SiHPh), and other hydride species. Catalytic and stoichiometric reactivity of 3 was studied. Complex 3 undergoes exchange with its minor diastereomer 3' by an agostic bond-opening/closing mechanism. It also exchanges the classical silyl group with free silane by an associative mechanism which most likely includes dissociation of the Si-H agostic bond followed by the rate-determining silane σ-bond metathesis. However, labeling experiments suggest the possibility of an alternative (minor) pathway in this exchange including a silanimine intermediate. 3 was found to catalyze dehydrogenative coupling of silane, hydrosilylation of carbonyls and nitriles, and dehydrogenative silylation of alcohols and amines. Stoichiometric reactions of 3 with nitriles proceed via intermediate formation of η(2)-adducts (ArN═)Mo(PMe(3))(η(2)-ArN═SiHPh)(η(2)-N≡CR), followed by an unusual Si-N coupling to give (ArN═)Mo(PMe(3))(κ(2)-NAr-SiHPh-C(R)═N-). Reactions of 3 with carbonyls lead to η(2)-carbonyl adducts (ArN═)(2)Mo(O═CRR')(PMe(3)) which were independently prepared by reactions of (ArN═)(2)Mo(PMe(3))(3) with the corresponding carbonyl O═CRR'. In the case of reaction with benzaldehyde, the silanimine adduct (ArN═)Mo(PMe(3))(η(2)-ArN═SiHPh)(η(2)-O═CHPh) was observed by NMR. Reactions of complex 3 with olefins lead to products of Si(ag)-C coupling, (ArN═)Mo(Et)(PMe(3))(η(3)-NAr-SiHPh-CH═CH(2)) (17) and (ArN═)Mo(H)(PMe(3))(η(3)-NAr-SiHPh-CH═CHPh), for ethylene and styrene, respectively. The hydride complex (ArN═)Mo(H)(PMe(3))(η(3)-NAr-SiHPh-CH═CH(2)) was obtained from 17 by hydrogenation and reaction with PhSiH(3). Mechanistic studies of the latter process revealed an unusual dependence of the rate constant on phosphine concentration, which was explained by competition of two reaction pathways. Reaction of 17 with PhSiH(3) in the presence of BPh(3) leads to agostic complex (ArN═)Mo(SiH(2)Ph)(η(3)-NAr-Si(Et)Ph-H)(η(2)-CH(2)═CH(2)) (24) having the Et substituent at the agostic silicon. Mechanistic studies show that the Et group stems from hydrogenation of the vinyl substituent by silane. Reaction of 24 with PMe(3) gives the agostic complex (ArN═)Mo(SiH(2)Ph)(PMe(3))(η(3)-NAr-Si(Et)Ph-H), which slowly reacts with PhSiH(3) to furnish silylamide 3 and the hydrosilylation product PhEtSiH(2). A mechanism involving silane attack on the imido ligand was proposed to explain this transformation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".