A Canadian Study of the Use of Poly-L-Lactic Acid Dermal Implant for the Treatment of Hill and Valley Acne Scarring
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hill and valley scarring is 1 of 3 atrophic scar types that occur as a result of acne, becoming more apparent with facial skin aging. Treatment includes resurfacing techniques and the use of injectable fillers. Poly-L-lactic acid is an injectable collagen builder that has been used for the treatment of HIV-associated lipodystrophy and cosmetic enhancement. OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of correction attainable with poly-L-lactic acid and safety findings for the treatment of hill and valley acne scarring. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Poly-L-lactic acid was injected over 3 to 4 serial treatments at 4-week intervals in 22 subjects in this single-arm, unblinded, open-label Phase II study. Efficacy was determined by physician, blinded evaluator, and subject assessment of scar improvement using Likert scales, comparing photographs taken by 3 camera systems at treatment visits 2 to 4 and follow-up to baseline. Subjects also assessed treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: Percentage of patients with much to excellent improvement using the most sensitive camera system (VISIA-CR) ranged from 45.5% to 68.2%. Subject treatment satisfaction scores increased by 44%. One patient experienced a palpable nonvisible nodule. No subjects discontinued treatment. CONCLUSION: Injectable poly-L-lactic acid facilitated improvement in hill and valley acne scarring and was well tolerated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it