Tetranuclear Lanthanide(III) Complexes with a Zigzag Topology from the Use of Pyridine-2,6-dimethanol: Synthetic, Structural, Spectroscopic, Magnetic and Photoluminescence Studies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reaction between Ln(NO3)3·xH2O (x = 5 or 6) and the potentially tridentate (N,O,O) chelating/bridging ligand pyridine-2,6-dimethanol (pdmH2), in the presence of base NEt3, affords a family of isostructural tetranuclear [Ln(III)4(NO3)2(pdmH)6(pdmH2)2](NO3)4 (Ln(III) = Eu(III), Gd(III), Tb(III), Dy(III), Ho(III), Er(III), Yb(III)) complexes with a rare zigzag topology. All complexes contain a [Ln4(μ-OR)6](6+) core with bridging ligation provided by the alkoxido arms of six η(1):η(1):η(2):μ pdmH(-) groups. The Ln(III) ions are eight coordinate with distorted geometries. Direct current magnetic susceptibility studies revealed predominant weak antiferromagnetic exchange interactions between the metal centers, which were quantified in the case of isotropic Gd(III)4 to give J = -0.09(1) cm(-1) and g = 2.00(1). The observation of out-of-phase (χ″M) ac susceptibility signals suggested that the Dy(III)4 analogue might be a molecular nanomagnet. Solid-state photoluminescence studies showed that the Eu(III)4 and Tb(III)4 compounds exhibit intense, sharp, and narrow emission bands in the red and green visible regions, respectively, which arise from the characteristic (5)D0 → (7)FJ and (5)D4 → (7)FJ transitions. The combined results demonstrate the ability of pdmH2 ligand to yield homometallic 4f clusters with interesting magnetic and optical properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it