MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320021935 · doi:10.2741/3801

Biological properties of the PrP-like Shadoo protein

2010· review· en· W2320021935 on OpenAlexafffund
Nathalie Daude

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in bioscience · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPrion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFondation pour la Recherche Médicale
KeywordsPRNPScrapiePrion proteinTandem repeatAlleleBiologyGeneGlycoproteinGeneticsDiseaseMedicineGenomePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The SPRN gene encodes the Shadoo glycoprotein (Sho), a central nervous system-expressed member of the prion protein superfamily. Sho has similarity to two features within PrPC's natively unstructured N-terminus, a hydrophobic domain and tandem repeats with positively charged residues. Indeed, scrutiny of Sho's biochemical properties in uninfected cells has revealed overlaps with the properties of PrPC, these including shared protein binding partners. SPRN is conserved in mammals, as is the prion gene PRNP, but in sheep SPRN and PRNP are both marked by polymorphic variation, suggestive of a shared selection pressure within these scrapie disease-prone livestock animals. In rodent models of prion disease there are reduced levels of Sho in infected tissues, defining a form of cross-regulation between full-length Sho holoprotein and PrPSc. In human prion disease an SPRN signal peptide polymorphism is associated with risk for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (CJD), while two patients with early-onset variant CJD carried putatively inactive SPRN alleles. Further investigation of Sho as a novel tracer or modifier for the accumulation of pathologic forms of PrP may prove advantageous.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in bioscienceSame topicPrion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingFrench-language works237,207