MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320061301 · doi:10.1107/s0108767311093846

300 bar<i>in situ</i>gas pressure cell for powder diffractometers

2011· article· en· W2320061301 on OpenAlexaff
Pamela S. Whitfield, J Graham Ross, John B. Parise

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAcoustic Wave Resonator Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIn situBar (unit)Materials scienceGas pressureChemistryGeologyPetroleum engineeringPhysicsMeteorologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A new in-situ cell has been designed and constructed to simulate the temperature, pressure and chemical conditions present in deep saline aquifers.The cell has been built to study reactions at the CO 2brine-solid interfaces produced during injection of supercritical CO 2 (sc-CO 2 ) for storage and sequestration purposes.Much of the data relating to CO 2 storage relates to oil and gas wells.However, by far the largest potential reservoirs are deep saline aquifers where the chemistry has little in common with oil wells.Little experimental data exists on the behavior of various rocks and engineering materials under these conditions, particularly with injection of impure CO 2 streams, and some of the existing data give significant cause for concern.The cell has been designed for both reflection and transmission geometries so may be used both in laboratory and synchrotron environments.Although sc-CO 2 /water often reacts slowly under equilibrium, concerns have been raised about impurities such as SO 2 and H 2 S that will inevitably be present in industrial streams.These gases can react rapidly, so the slower laboratory and more rapid synchrotron measurements are highly complementary.Flow-through experiments may also be possible but haven't been specifically targeted.The cell has maximum working conditions of 300 bar pressure and 300 °C in pH3 brine conditions.These conditions are extremely demanding for any metals, sealing and window materials, and the restrictions imposed by the ASME Pressure Vessel and Boiler Code [1] and Process Piping Code [2] posed additional challenges.The materials certification requirements in the ASME code forced us into using structural grade beryllium windows as in our first generation cell [3].Beryllium is highly susceptible to chloride corrosion so a thin coating of tantalum is used to protect the windows under these conditions.Requirements of the pressure vessel certification process meant the cell was successfully tested hydrostatically to 450 bar pressure before delivery.Some of the theoretical and practical considerations for the design and construction of the cell will be described.Although the cell may be used with a laboratory diffractometer, the silver X-ray tube source and high-energy optimized PSD detector needed to gain sufficient penetration and signal are not standard components.Such a cell needs to be operated as part of an overall 'system' and is of limited use in isolation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.071

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Crystallographica Section A Foundations of CrystallographySame topicAcoustic Wave Resonator TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207