MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2320090071 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am10-2123

Abstract 2123: Novel integration sites for Friend murine leukemia virus

2010· article· en· W2320090071 on OpenAlexaff
Mehran Haeri, Yaacov Ben‐David

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicVirus-based gene therapy research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMurine leukemia virusRetrovirusBiologySouthern blotVirologyRestriction enzymeProvirusMolecular biologyLeukemiaGeneRestriction siteGenomeLong terminal repeatDNAVirusGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Friend murine leukemia virus (F-MuLV), a type C retrovirus, induces erythroleukemia when injected into certain strains of mice. The Induction of erythroleukemia is associated with viral integration into Friend leukemia integration site-1 (Fli-1). In some F-MuLV-infected mice we did not observe viral integration into Fli-1 region by Southern blot analysis. We hypothesize that induction of leukemia in these mice is due to insertion of F-MuLV into a novel integration site distinct from Fli-1. Methods: The genomic DNA of F-MuLV-induced leukemic cells is digested by StuI restriction enzyme. DNA sequences of about 50 base pairs in length, termed adaptors, are then ligated to both ends of the digested fragments. Using primers for the adaptors and F-MuLV sequences, we performed PCR, followed by nested PCR to amplify those fragments that contain F-MuLV sequence. The PCR product is gel purified, cloned into a TA vector and sequenced. The sequences are compared to mouse genome databank to determine the F-MuLV flanking sequences. Results: We identified seven novel integration sites for F-MuLV. Three of these sites are located inside genes and the remaining four do not interrupt any genes. We performed PCR to check if any of these integration sites were also targets of F-MuLV in twenty other tumors of the same type. We found that one of these integration sites which is close to Myb gene occurred in twenty five percent of the tested tumors in an area 1 kb in length. Conclusion: We identified seven novel F-MuLV integration sites for F-MuLV. We showed that the integration site on chromosome 10 close to the Myb gene occurs in 25% of F-MuLV- induced tumors and is therefore a common integration site. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 2123.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.350 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicVirus-based gene therapy research→French-language works237,207→