Foaming Poly(vinyl alcohol)/Microfibrillated Cellulose Composites with CO<sub>2</sub> and Water as Co-blowing Agents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We investigated the continuous extrusion foaming of poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVOH)/microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) composites using supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO 2 ) as the blowing agent. First, the as-received PVOH pellets were compounded with water to decrease their melting point. Then, they were compounded with an MFC solution to prepare the sample. Both scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) showed that the MFC dispersed well in the PVOH/MFC composites. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) results showed that adding MFC affected the thermal behavior. This, in turn, affected cell nucleation and cell growth phenomena during foam extrusion. Water also acted as a co-blowing agent, together with scCO 2, in creating biodegradable polymer foams with a uniform cell structure and a high cell density. The effects of the MFC content, scCO 2 content, and die temperature variations on the cell density and cellular morphology of the PVOH/MFC composite foams were examined systematically.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".