Sex expression in the clonal gynodioecious herb<i>Glechoma hederacea</i>(Lamiaceae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The frequency of sex morphs of the clonal plant, Glechoma hederacea L., was recorded at ramet, clone, and population levels in the province of Skåne, South Sweden. In a random sample of 748 ramets at 31 sites, 68% of the ramets possessed only hermaphrodite flowers, 22% possessed only female flowers, and 10% were partially male sterile with both hermaphrodite and female flowers. At one-third of the sites, only one sex morph was found (mostly hermaphrodites). At the other sites, the proportion of female ramets and partially male-sterile ramets ranged from 3 to 100%. Multilocus genotypes were established using isozyme electrophoresis to study sex expression (stamen fertility) at different levels (among flowers within ramets, among ramets within genets, and among genets) in the field and for transplants raised under uniform greenhouse conditions. Sex expression was found to be genotype specific. Some genets were stable females or stable hermaphrodites, others being partially male sterile with a specific level of stamen fertility both in the field and in cultivation. Some multilocus genotypes showed great variation in stamen fertility among plots both in the field and in cultivation, indicating that sex expression in these genets was greatly influenced by environmental conditions. Stamen fertility varied temporally and spatially in ramets of the partially male-sterile sex types. Flower size was positively correlated with stamen fertility.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".