Iron pairs in beryl: New insights from electron paramagnetic resonance, synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and ab initio calculations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Beryl’s various coloring make it a sought-after and precious gemstone. Knowledge on the physical origin behind the various colorings is essential to differentiate artificial colorings from natural ones. The blue color of the variety aquamarine has been proposed to be due to charge transfer between adjacent Fe 3+ -Fe 2+ pairs on the Al site and its adjacent 6g interstitial position, respectively. The present work presents the first experimental confirmation of such an arrangement. Single-crystal electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectra of a light blue beryl (Springbok, South Africa), before, and after annealing at 800 °C, have been measured at temperatures from 25 to 295 K and reveal two Fe 3+ -Fe 3+ pairs related to an axial Fe 3+ center at the effective g = ~2.00 as well as a subordinate rhombic Fe 3+ center at g = ~4.28. Powder EPR spectra show that the intensity of the axial Fe 3+ center increases after annealing from 400 to 800 °C but becomes constant after 800 °C, whereas the rhombic Fe 3+ center is not affected by annealing. One Fe 3+ -Fe 3+ pair is the same as the one investigated previously by Edgar and Hutton (1982) and arises from Fe 3+ ions at the two nearest Al sites along the c axis. The best-fit spin Hamiltonian parameters show that the second Fe 3+ -Fe 3+ pair is also oriented parallel to the c axis and has a separation of 2.4 Å, corresponding to Fe 3+ ions at an Al site and its nearest 6g interstitial position. The increased intensities of both Fe 3+ -Fe 3+ pairs after annealing suggest their formation from Fe 3+ -Fe 2+ and Fe 2+ -Fe 2+ precursors. Modeling of synchrotron Fe K-edge X-ray absorption spectra measured on the sample annealed at 1000 °C also shows occupancies of Fe 3+ at both the Al site and the 6g interstitial position. The assignment of the rhombic Fe 3+ center to the Be site remains tentative.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".