Évocation de l'habitat patricien à Angers au XIIe siècle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two twelfth-century examples of a patrician residence in Angers. The rise of the city of Angers under the Plantagenêts left behind prestigious twelfth-century monuments as well as archaeological and archival traces of résidences for clergy and patricians. These lodgings, located in the episcopal Cité and in the Doutre ( a quarter on the far shore of the Maine), give a glimpse of a specific monumental and social landscape. Two major edifices that probably belonged to lay lords, the hôtel de « Beauvau-Montiron », which is still standing, and the manor called the «Tower of the Druids » (demolished in 1865), are studied here in detail, and when compared to other buildings, they allow one to sketch a typology of the urban aristocratic manor house. If the « tower manor » illustrated by the « Tower of the Druids » — with its massed plan and its two superposed, vaulted upper rooms — seems to lie a marginal form, the dominant model is the « manor on an elongated plan », with a great hall on the upper floor wonderfully lit by a continuons series of double windows. The hôtel de « Beauvau-Montiron », with a façade 27 meters long, is the most accomplished example. Quite striking in the quarter of the Doutre, its plan seems essentially linked to a thinly populated, semi-rural environment, even if this conception can be found in the more densely settled Cité, for example the bishopric, and constitutes a standard for residences of higher rank.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".