MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320415684 · doi:10.5383/ijtee.01.01.005

Energy Use, Energy Savings and Environmental Analysis of Industrial

2010· article· en· W2320415684 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rahman Saidur, M. Hasanuzzaman, Nurfatihah Rahim

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Thermal and Environmental Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnvironmental Impact and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy (signal processing)Environmental scienceEnergy analysisStatisticsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper energy use , energy and bill savings, emission reduction and pay period using high efficient motor, variable speed drive by modulating speed of boiler and compressor has been estimated using energy audit data.It has been found that 68,923 MWh, 132,922 MWh, 78,769 MWh and 49,230 MWh of energy can be saved for 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% motor loadings, respectively for 20% speed reduction in the boiler system.Corresponding bill savings for the aforementioned energy savings have been found to be US$ 4,411,052, US$ 8,507,028, US$ 5,041,202, and US$ 43,150,751 for 40%, 60%, 80% and 100% motor loadings, respectively for 20% speed reduction in the boiler system.Energy savings and bill savings resulting from the use of high-efficiency motor in air compressor are 6703 MWh, 8251 MWh, and 10571 MWh, total energy, can be saved for 50%, 75%, and 100%, motor loadings, respectively.Similarly, bill savings for the preceding amounts of energy savings are US$ 428,984, US$ 528,042 and US$ 676,538, respectively.It is also clear that the use of high efficiency motor and VSDs leads to substantial energy savings and an enormous reduction in emissions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Thermal and Environmental EngineeringSame topicEnvironmental Impact and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207