Structural and electronic properties of poly(3-hexylthiophene)<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>π</mml:mi></mml:math>-stacked crystals
Bibliographic record
Abstract
First-principles density-functional theory (DFT) method has been used to investigate the structural and electronic properties of regioregular head-to-tail poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl) (rrP3HT) crystal. Among the different configurations investigated for the rrP3HT crystal, the most stable is a staggered structure which is 875 meV/monomer more stable than isolated rrP3HT chains. Electronic properties of the rrP3HT crystal are strongly influenced by the magnitude of $\ensuremath{\pi}\text{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\pi}$ interactions that can be described by structural organization parameters such as the interchain distance in the stacking direction. From a disordered to a tightly packed polymer crystal, the direct band gap significantly decreases by $\ensuremath{\sim}0.8\text{ }\text{eV}$, while the dispersion of highest occupied molecular-orbital and lowest unoccupied molecular-orbital bands increase by 0.60 and 1.33 eV, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".