Detection of Irradiated Pulses by PSL Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Photostimulated luminescence (PSL) as a screening method is very simple and rapid to detect irradiated foods but various disadvantages (light induced fading of PSL signal or response to clean foods with minerals insensitive to PSL measurement). In this study the characteristics of radiation induced PSL for 10 kinds of pulses (Chinese Soybean and Adzuki bean, Pinto bean, Cowpea, Green gram, Canadian Blue pea and Soybean, American Black-eyed pea and Chickpea, Red Kidney Bean) were investigated. The screening-PSL (s-PSL) cumulate counts of pulses significantly increased with irradiation dose up to 3kGy. The s-PSL cumulate counts of irradiated pulses gradually decreased with increasing storage periods. The s-PSL cumulate counts of all pulse samples irradiated at a minimum dose of 0.5kGy exceeded considerably the upper screening threshold (5000 counts) regardless of storage period. Calibrated PSL (Cal-PSL) were obtained by re-irradiating the pulse samples with a gamma ray dose of 1kGy and the PSL ratios (s-PSL/Cal-PSL) were calculated for normalization of sensitivity of the pulse samples. The PSL ratio at each irradiation dose was almost similar regardless of kind of pulses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".