MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320644802 · doi:10.3139/146.110638

A model to calculate the viscosity of silicate melts

2012· article· en· W2320644802 on OpenAlexaff
Eli Brosh, Arthur D. Pelton, Sergei A. Decterov

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Materials Research (formerly Zeitschrift fuer Metallkunde) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMetallurgical Processes and Thermodynamics
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsViscosityMaterials scienceSilicateTernary operationOxideTernary numeral systemBoronThermodynamicsAlkali metalBoron oxideMineralogyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical engineeringMetallurgyComposite materialChemistryOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Our recently developed model for the viscosity of silicate melts is extended to describe and predict the viscosities of oxide melts containing boron. The model requires three adjustable parameters to reproduce the viscosity of B 2 O 3 –SiO 2 melts and two parameters for each B 2 O 3 – M O x melt, where M O x is a basic oxide other than an alkali oxide. All available experimental data have been collected for binary melts formed by B 2 O 3 with SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , CaO, MgO, ZnO, PbO to calibrate the model. The viscosities of the B 2 O 3 -containing ternary and higher-order subsystems of the B 2 O 3 –CaO–MgO–PbO–ZnO–SiO 2 system and of the B 2 O 3 –CaO–MgO–PbO–ZnO–Al 2 O 3 system are then predicted by the model without any additional adjustable parameters. Experimental data were found for only five such subsystems: B 2 O 3 –PbO–SiO 2 , B 2 O 3 –CaO–SiO 2 , B 2 O 3 –PbO–ZnO, B 2 O 3 –PbO–Al 2 O 3 and B 2 O 3 –CaO–Al 2 O 3 . Predictions of the model are compared to these experimental data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.365
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Materials Research (formerly Zeitschrift fuer Metallkunde)Same topicMetallurgical Processes and ThermodynamicsFrench-language works237,207