Hydrodeoxygenation of 2,5-Hexanedione and 2,5-Dimethylfuran by Water-, Air-, and Acid-Stable Homogeneous Ruthenium and Iridium Catalysts
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The complexes [(4′-Ph-terpy)Ru(H 2 O) 3 ](OTf) 2 and [(4′-Ph-terpy)Ir(OTf) 3 ] have been evaluated as catalysts for the conversion of 2,5-hexanedione and 2,5-dimethylfuran to hydrodeoxygenated products in aqueous acidic medium at elevated temperature (150–225 °C) under hydrogen gas (5.5 MPa). These two substrates form part of a value chain leading from C 6 sugars to 2,5-hexanediol, 2,5-dimethyltetrahydrofuran, and hexane, which can be generated by the homogeneously acting ruthenium catalyst in up to 69%, 80%, and 10% yield, respectively, while at T > 175 °C the iridium system decomposes to a highly active but heterogeneously acting coating in the reactor defeating the premise of a homogeneous catalyst system. The deactivation and decomposition pathway of both catalysts leads to the formation of a series of isostructural complexes [M(4′-Ph-terpy) 2 ] n + (M = Fe, Ni, Ru, Ir; n = 2, 3) characterized by ESI-MS and single crystal X-ray crystallography, in which the source of the Fe and Ni is the 316SS reactor body.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it