MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2320660360 · doi:10.1017/s0317167100006880

Severe, Reversible Dysphagia from Chloroquine and Hydroxychloroquine Myopathy

2007· letter· en· W2320660360 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Farrah J. Mateen, B. Mark Keegan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2007
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydroxychloroquineDysphagiaMyopathyChloroquineMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationSurgeryInternal medicinePathologyCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine are 4-aminoquinoline medications used in the treatment of malaria, amebiasis, connective tissue diseases, and skin disorders. 1A generalized toxic neuromyopathy can occur with their use.We report an 89year-old man with severe, relatively isolated and reversible dysphagia related to combined chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine myopathy.An 89-year-old man presented with a 3-year history of progressive oropharyngeal dysphagia with both solids and liquids.He had no fatigability of chewing or swallowing but had difficulty propelling the bolus back to his posterior pharynx.His dysphagia was profound, and he had lost over 20 pounds of weight.He twice developed aspiration pneumonia.He was otherwise in good health and had longstanding morphea profunda, a circumscribed, localized sclerosis of the skin and underlying soft tissues involving his chest, back, buttocks, and limbs.The morphea was diagnosed 18 years previously, and was successfully treated with hydroxychloroquine 200 mg twice daily by mouth for 18 years in addition to chloroquine 500 mg thrice weekly for the previous two years.He was not treated with cholesterol-lowering medications or other medications associated with myopathy.Swallowing studies demonstrated dysphagia and a cricopharyngeal bar.A cricopharyngeal myotomy was recommended by his local physicians.On flexible laryngoscopic assessment and review by an otolaryngologist, he had normal vocal cord motion, normal mucosa and no mass lesions.Poor tongue base propulsion and poor laryngeal elevation were found.On neurological examination, he had dysarthria and mild, symmetrical weakness involving the deltoids (4/5 MRC grading) and the neck flexors (4/5).He had focal weakness of the left toe extensors and the posterior and anterior tibialis from a prior L5 radiculopathy but otherwise no demonstrable diffuse or proximal lower extremity weakness.Motor strength in the face was normal with normal pharyngeal motion and no tongue atrophy or fasciculations.Muscle stretch reflexes were normal in the upper extremity and mildly reduced in the lower extremities with flexor plantar responses bilaterally.Sensation revealed only slight age-appropriate vibratory sensory deficit.Creatinine kinase (CK) was elevated at 557 units/litre (normal <336 U/l).Anti-acetylcholine receptor, anti-striated muscle antibody, β-hexosaminidase, serum protein electrophoresis and other basic laboratory studies were normal.Magnetic resonance

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0080.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques→Same topicDrug-Induced Ocular Toxicity→French-language works237,207→