High Volume Low Density Culture of Milkfish (Chanos chanos Forsskal) in Floating Net Cages at North Bais Bay Manjuyod-side, Negros oriental
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The study was conducted at Resources Production Technology (REPROTECH), Incorporated in north Bais Bay (Manjuyod side), Negros Oriental. The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the feasibility and viability of milkfish (Chanos chanos forsskal) cultured in 180-m3 (6m x 6m x 5m) High Volume Low Density (HVLD) floating net cages and established a benchmark for cage farmers using a technology that offers a promising strategy that can have enormous impact on both socio-economic growth and food security. Results showed that bangus attained an average body weight (ABW) of 376.32 grams, after an average day of culture (DOC) of 163. It also showed an excellent survival rate of 111% and a very satisfactory feed conversion ratio (FCR) of 2.4. The average production per unit cage reached 2,480 kg or 13.78 kg/m3 of cage volume. The project realized a profit margin of Php. 34.94 per kilogram, indicating that even if the market price per kilogram is reduced by 10% the project is still gaining. Milkfish production in HVLD floating cages is economically viable for small and medium enterprise (SMI) fish farmers and promises a very attractive Return of Investment (ROI) estimated at 64.18% and a payback period of 0.4 year.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it