Discrimination of Prohibited Oral Use From Authorized Inhaled Treatment of Budesonide in Sports
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Budesonide (22(R,S)-16α,17α-butylidenedioxy-11β,21-dihydroxypregna-1,4-diene-3,20-dione) (BUD) is a glucocorticoid widely used for the treatment of asthma and rhinitis. Its use in sport competitions is prohibited when administered by oral, intravenous, intramuscular, or rectal routes, but its use by other routes (eg, inhalation) is allowed. The objective of this study was to evaluate the urinary profiles of different metabolites of BUD after oral and inhaled administrations in order to define a criterion to discriminate between forbidden and authorized administrations of the drug. METHODS: A liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method was validated to quantify BUD, 16α-hydroxy-prednisolone, 6β-hydroxy-budesonide, and 6α-hydroxy-budesonide and to qualitatively determine 13 additional BUD metabolites. The method was applied to urine samples collected in clinical studies where BUD was administered to healthy volunteers by the oral route (n = 2) and by inhalation for 3 consecutive days followed by a single oral dose (n = 8). RESULTS: Reporting levels of the different metabolites were evaluated in terms of specificity (no false-positive results after inhalation) and sensitivity (no false-negative results after oral intake). CONCLUSION: Taking into consideration the administered doses, the best compromise to discriminate between authorized inhaled administration and forbidden oral intake of BUD was found using a reporting level of 20 ng/mL of metabolite 6β-hydroxy-budesonide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".