MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320705440 · doi:10.1093/ee/nvv231

Effect of Wheat Cultivars and Blends on the Oviposition and Larval Mortality of<i>Cephus cinctus</i>(Hymenoptera: Cephidae) and Parasitism by<i>Bracon cephi</i>(Hymenoptera: Braconidae)

2016· article· en· W2320705440 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Héctor A. Cárcamo, Brian L. Beres, Tony R. Larson, Cassidy L. Klima, X. Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Entomology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect-Plant Interactions and Control
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAgriculture and Agri-Food CanadaWestern Grains Research Foundation
KeywordsBiologySawflyBraconidaeParasitoidCultivarHymenopteraInfestationAgronomyParasitismPEST analysisBiological pest controlLarvaIntegrated pest managementHost (biology)BotanyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The wheat stem sawfly (Cephus cinctus Norton) is a major historical pest of wheat in the northern Great Plains of North America. The insect spends most of its life as a larva protected inside grass stems so that its management has relied on strategies other than insecticides. We conducted a study in southern Alberta from 2006-2009 to assess the effects of wheat species, cultivar, seeding rate, and blending a resistant and a vulnerable cultivar, on oviposition, larval infestation, and cutting damage. The mortality caused by its primary parasitoid, Bracon cephi (Gahan), was also assessed to investigate the potential benefit of cultivar blends to enhance sawfly biological control. Sawfly laid fewer eggs on plants of the durum cultivar 'AC Avonlea' and on those of the solid-stemmed cultivar 'Lillian' compared to plants of the hollow-stemmed cultivar 'CDC Go.' Larval establishments (infestation) followed a similar pattern to that of oviposition. At these locations there was low cutting damage in most years and to a large extent this was due to mortality inflicted by the parasitoid Bracon cephi (40-60%). However, the remaining mortality was attributed to other factors and host, particularly the inclusion of the solid-stemmed cultivar. Direct and indirect factors likely affected the success of the parasitoid in the crop monocultures and blends, and these mechanisms require further research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.580
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnvironmental EntomologySame topicInsect-Plant Interactions and ControlFrench-language works237,207