Sugar-Conjugated Bis(glycinato)copper(II) Complexes and Their Modulating Influence on the Maillard Reaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Transition metal ions are known to play an important role in the Maillard reaction in catalyzing redox reactions. They can also form strong binary complexes with amino acids with increased reactivity toward smaller aldehydes. To take advantage of this enhanced reactivity and to demonstrate the ability of glucose to conjugate with glycine copper complexes, model systems containing (Gly)2Cu and glucose or their isotopically enriched counterparts were heated in aqueous solutions in the presence and absence of paraformaldehyde at 110 °C for 2 h and the residues were analyzed by electrospray ionization/quadrupole time-of-flight/mass spectrometry (ESI/qTOF/MS). Isotope-labeling studies have indicated the ability of (Gly)2Cu complexes to act as molecular scaffolds and undergo multiple reactions with glucose to generate various complexes of sugar conjugates. These relatively stable intermediates allowed for the slower release of aroma and browning precursors, such as Amadori products, during heating, as assessed by the extent of browning and total volatile release.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".