276 Occupation, industry, and the risk of prostate cancer: a case-control study in Montréal, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<h3>Introduction</h3> Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer among Canadian men. Age, a family history of PCa and ancestry are the only recognised risk factors, but a role for environmental influences is suspected. <h3>Objective</h3> To explore the relationship between occupational and industry titles, and PCa risk. <h3>Methods</h3> PROtEuS (<i>Prostate cancer & Environment Study</i>) is a case-control study of PCa in Montréal, Canada including some 2000 cases and 2000 population controls aged 40–75 years. Detailed occupational histories were elicited through in-person interviews. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between PCa and employment in 98 occupations and 74 industries. Models were adjusted for age, ancestry, family history of PCa, PCa screening, income and physical activity. <h3>Results</h3> Elevated PCa risks were found for social sciences workers (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1–3.4) and metal product fabricators (OR 3.4; 95%CI 1.3–9.3) employed ≥ 10 years, and for non-construction painters (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.3–9.0) and plumbers and steamfitters (OR 2.4; 95%CI 1.1–5.4) employed < 10 years. Reduced risks were observed for farmers (OR 0.6; 95%CI 0.4–0.9) and food services workers (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4–0.9) employed < 10 years, and for physical scientists employed ≥ 10 years (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.5–0.9). Workers in public service, wood products, and jewellery industries had excess PCa risks. Those in agriculture, miscellaneous food, accommodation and food, air transport, and retail trade industries had reduced risks. Analyses including all subjects, or stratified according to white or blue collar status generated consistent findings. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Our findings suggest excess PCa risks in some metal-related occupations, as well as in white-collar occupations such as in public service and social sciences. Farmers and food services workers had reduced risks. Specific occupational exposures possibly underlying these associations will be explored.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".