MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320732237 · doi:10.1136/oemed-2013-101717.276

276 Occupation, industry, and the risk of prostate cancer: a case-control study in Montréal, Canada

2013· article· en· W2320732237 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jean‐François Sauvé, Lavoué, Parent

Bibliographic record

VenueOccupational and Environmental Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOdds ratioMedicineConfidence intervalFamily historyProstate cancerDemographyLogistic regressionPopulationCase-control studyGerontologyCancerEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<h3>Introduction</h3> Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common cancer among Canadian men. Age, a family history of PCa and ancestry are the only recognised risk factors, but a role for environmental influences is suspected. <h3>Objective</h3> To explore the relationship between occupational and industry titles, and PCa risk. <h3>Methods</h3> PROtEuS (<i>Prostate cancer &amp; Environment Study</i>) is a case-control study of PCa in Montréal, Canada including some 2000 cases and 2000 population controls aged 40–75 years. Detailed occupational histories were elicited through in-person interviews. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between PCa and employment in 98 occupations and 74 industries. Models were adjusted for age, ancestry, family history of PCa, PCa screening, income and physical activity. <h3>Results</h3> Elevated PCa risks were found for social sciences workers (OR 1.9; 95% CI 1.1–3.4) and metal product fabricators (OR 3.4; 95%CI 1.3–9.3) employed ≥ 10 years, and for non-construction painters (OR 3.4; 95% CI 1.3–9.0) and plumbers and steamfitters (OR 2.4; 95%CI 1.1–5.4) employed &lt; 10 years. Reduced risks were observed for farmers (OR 0.6; 95%CI 0.4–0.9) and food services workers (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.4–0.9) employed &lt; 10 years, and for physical scientists employed ≥ 10 years (OR 0.6; 95% CI 0.5–0.9). Workers in public service, wood products, and jewellery industries had excess PCa risks. Those in agriculture, miscellaneous food, accommodation and food, air transport, and retail trade industries had reduced risks. Analyses including all subjects, or stratified according to white or blue collar status generated consistent findings. <h3>Conclusions</h3> Our findings suggest excess PCa risks in some metal-related occupations, as well as in white-collar occupations such as in public service and social sciences. Farmers and food services workers had reduced risks. Specific occupational exposures possibly underlying these associations will be explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.300
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOccupational and Environmental MedicineSame topicAir Quality and Health ImpactsFrench-language works237,207