MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320894692 · doi:10.1021/om500479q

Iron Catalysts Containing Amine(imine)diphosphine P-NH-N-P Ligands Catalyze both the Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Asymmetric Transfer Hydrogenation of Ketones

2014· article· en· W2320894692 on OpenAlexaff
Weiwei Zuo, Sebastian Tauer, Demyan E. Prokopchuk, Robert H. Morris

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganometallics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryMedicinal chemistryCatalysisAcetophenoneTransfer hydrogenationHydrideImineHeterolysisAmine gas treatingOrganic chemistryHydrogenRuthenium

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide When activated with base, the iron(II) complexes with tetradentate amine(imine)diphosphine ligands, ( S, S )- trans -[FeCl(CO)(PAr 2 -NH-N-PAr′ 2 )]BF 4 ( 1: Ar, Ar′ = Ph; 2: Ar = Ph, Ar′ = 4-MeC 6 H 4; 3: Ar, Ar′ = 3,5-Me 2 C 6 H 3 ), are very active for the asymmetric transfer hydrogenation (ATH) of ketones in KO t Bu/2-propanol. For ATH, better enantioselectivity, but lower catalytic activity, was observed in general when using catalyst precursors with the bulkier dixylylphosphino groups compared to those with diphenylphosphino groups. The complexes were much less active for the pressure hydrogenation of ketones, where 1 and 2 produced racemic product alcohols, while 3 yielded chiral alcohols with an enantiomeric excess of up to 70% ( R ) at turnover frequencies up to 80 h –1 and turnover numbers of 100 for a range of ketones at 50 °C and 20 atm H 2 . This is a rare example of asymmetric pressure hydrogenation using an iron complex. Unlike the case of ATH, there is no effect on the rate upon the addition of KO t Bu beyond the 2 equiv needed to convert the precursor complex to the active amido(ene-amido) and amine(ene-amido)hydrido forms. Both AH and ATH reactions share the same iron hydride intermediate formed by reaction of the amido(ene-amido) iron complex with either dihydrogen or 2-propanol. Kinetic studies on the H 2 hydrogenation of acetophenone catalyzed by 1, activated by base in benzene, using the method of initial rates indicated that the heterolytic splitting of the dihydrogen at the amido(ene-amido) iron complex is the turnover-limiting step of the catalytic cycle for hydrogenation. For 1 in benzene at 323 K over the ranges of concentrations [ 1 ] = (2.4–4.8) × 10 –4 M and [ketone] = (3.6–7.2) × 10 –2 M, and of H 2 pressures = 10–20 atm, the rate law is rate = k [ 1 ][H 2 ], with k = 0.16 ± 0.01 M –1 s –1, Δ H ⧧ = 10.0 ± 0.2 kcal mol –1, and Δ S ⧧ = −31.0 ± 0.5 cal mol –1 K –1 . Detailed DFT calculations also support the finding that the barrier for H 2 splitting is the turnover-limiting step. The higher barrier for H 2 activation compared to isopropanol activation in order to generate the active amine(ene-amido)hydrido form explains why this system is biased toward ATH over AH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations103
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOrganometallicsSame topicAsymmetric Hydrogenation and CatalysisFrench-language works237,207