MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2320997692 · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e318250dc95

The Influence of Closing-Opening Wedge Osteotomy on Sagittal Balance in Thoracolumbar Kyphosis Secondary to Ankylosing Spondylitis

2012· article· en· W2320997692 on OpenAlexaff
Bangping Qian, Xinhua Wang, Yong Qiu, Bin Wang, Zezhang Zhu, Jun Jiang, Xu Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueSpine · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicScoliosis diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsObject Research Systems (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineKyphosisOsteotomySagittal planeAnkylosing spondylitisVertebraSurgeryOrthodonticsRadiographyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In Brief Study Design. A retrospective study. Objective. To compare the radiographical and clinical outcomes between closing wedge osteotomy (CWO) and closing-opening wedge osteotomy (COWO) for thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis. Summary of Background Data. Several surgical techniques have been used to correct the fixed thoracolumbar kyphosis caused by ankylosing spondylitis. To date, the comparison of the outcomes between CWO and COWO has not yet been addressed. Methods. According to the association with anterior edge opening or not shown on the postoperative radiographs, 64 patients were divided into 2 groups (35 patients in the CWO group and 29 patients in the COWO group). The radiographical and clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups, with a mean follow-up of 36 months (range, 24–84 mo). Radiographical measurements included thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, global kyphosis, sagittal vertical axis, osteotomized vertebra angle, and the height of the osteotomized vertebra. Oswestry Disability Index was evaluated at the final follow-up. Results. Thoracic kyphosis did not change significantly between postoperatively and the final follow-up in both groups. The mean corrections of lumbar lordosis, global kyphosis, sagittal vertical axis, and osteotomized vertebra angle were significantly larger in the COWO group than in the CWO group (P < 0.05). Notably, statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed in the variation of height of the osteotomized vertebra (1.3 cm in the CWO group vs. 0.7 cm in the COWO group). In both groups, no patients had pseudarthrosis at the osteotomy level at the last follow-up. There was no significant difference of Oswestry Disability Index scores between the 2 groups at the final follow-up. Conclusion. Both CWO and COWO are safe and effective surgical methods for correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis. COWO can obtain larger correction and better sagittal alignment without additional neurological complications. This study focuses on the comparison of the radiographical and clinical outcomes between closing wedge osteotomy and closing-opening wedge osteotomy for thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis. The results of this study suggest that closing-opening wedge osteotomy can achieve better correction than closing wedge osteotomy without additional neurological complications in patients with ankylosing spondylitis with fixed thoracolumbar kyphosis and sagittal imbalance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations95
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSpineSame topicScoliosis diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207