MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321070695 · doi:10.2514/6.2013-383

Time-Accurate Flow Simulations Using an Efficient Newton-Krylov-Schur Approach with High-Order Temporal and Spatial Discretization

2013· article· en· W2321070695 on OpenAlex
Pieter D. Boom, David W. Zingg

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue51st AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComputational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiscretizationComputer scienceFlow (mathematics)Applied mathematicsComputational scienceOrder (exchange)Newton's methodMathematical optimizationAlgorithmParallel computingMathematicsMathematical analysisPhysicsGeometryNonlinear system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to demonstrate the potential advantages of high-order spatial and temporal discretizations, implicit large-eddy simulations of the Taylor-Green vortex flow and transitional flow over an SD7003 wing are computed using a variable-order finite-difference code on multi-block structured meshes. The spatial operators satisfy the summation-by-parts property, with block interface coupling and boundary conditions enforced through simultaneous approximation terms. The solution is integrated in time with explicit-first-stage, singly-diagonally-implicit Runge-Kutta methods. Simulations of the Taylor-Green vortex show the clear advantage of high-order spatial discretizations in terms of accuracy and efficiency. The higher-order methods are better able to delay excessive dissipation on coarser grids and are better able to capture the details of the flow on finer grids. Similar dissipation and enstrophy profiles are obtained with a second-order spatial discretization, and a fourth-order spatial discretization with half the number of grid points in each direction, half the number of time steps, and approximately 85% less CPU time. Temporal convergence studies demonstrate the relatively high efficiency of the fourth-order explicit-first-stage, singly-diagonally-implicit Runge-Kutta method, except for simulations requiring only a minimum level of accuracy. Results of the simulation of transitional flow over the SD7003 wing show good agreement with experiment and other computations, despite a relatively coarse grid. The use of high-order discretizations is shown to be essential in obtaining this accuracy efficiently. These results give a clear picture of the bene fits of high-order discretizations, along with the advantages of the novel parallel Newton-Krylov-Schur algorithm presented, for high-accuracy unsteady flow simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.258
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it