Aire métropolitaine et grand événementiel: Une conscientisation différenciée et progressive du territoire. Étude de cas de Lille 2004, Capitale européenne de la Culture
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Within the globalization of the economy, the formalization of the metropolitan areas limits depends on the political association due to the regional context. Behind the importance of the cooperation agreement between urban areas, to ensure that the territory is reaching a critical weight to compete with other cities at the European scale, it appears as crucial that the population living within this area become aware of the new space coming out, which doesn't match with the traditional political and administrative borders. This concern can pass by the cultural or sportive event for a couple of days to several months. What is the prevalence of a mega-event on the construction of a metropolitan area? Which kind of sustainable consciousness of the metropolitan city can be done by a short-lived event? Will this heedfulness be uniform and the same everywhere within the territory: should it be different according to institutional actors and civil society? The case study of Lille 2004, European Capital of Culture allows us to highlight the evolutions giving by this kind of flagship event for the constitution and the consciousness of the metropolitan region of Lille.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it