Aire métropolitaine et grand événementiel: Une conscientisation différenciée et progressive du territoire. Étude de cas de Lille 2004, Capitale européenne de la Culture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Within the globalization of the economy, the formalization of the metropolitan areas limits depends on the political association due to the regional context. Behind the importance of the cooperation agreement between urban areas, to ensure that the territory is reaching a critical weight to compete with other cities at the European scale, it appears as crucial that the population living within this area become aware of the new space coming out, which doesn't match with the traditional political and administrative borders. This concern can pass by the cultural or sportive event for a couple of days to several months. What is the prevalence of a mega-event on the construction of a metropolitan area? Which kind of sustainable consciousness of the metropolitan city can be done by a short-lived event? Will this heedfulness be uniform and the same everywhere within the territory: should it be different according to institutional actors and civil society? The case study of Lille 2004, European Capital of Culture allows us to highlight the evolutions giving by this kind of flagship event for the constitution and the consciousness of the metropolitan region of Lille.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".