MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2321189107 · doi:10.1061/40507(282)60

Removal of Organic Arsenic from Drinking Water

2000· article· en· W2321189107 on OpenAlexafffund
O. S. Thirunavukkarasu, T. Viraraghavan, K. S. Subramanian, S. Tanjore

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicArsenic contamination and mitigation
Canadian institutionsOceanWorks International (Canada)University of ReginaHealth Canada
FundersHealth Canada
KeywordsArsenicManganeseChemistryAdsorptionEnvironmental chemistryTap waterWater treatmentIon exchangeIron oxideIon-exchange resinInorganic chemistryEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental scienceIonOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Arsenic occurs in both inorganic and organic forms in water. Although various methods have been adopted to remove inorganic forms of arsenic from drinking water, not much emphasis was given for the removal of orgainc forms of arsenic in drinking water. In the present study column studies were conducted using manganese greensand, iron oxide-coated sand (1 and 2) and ion exchange resins in Fe3+ form, to examine the removal of organic arsenic (dimethylarsinic acid) spiked in tap water. Batch studies were conducted with IOCS-2, and the results showed that the organic arsenic adsorption capacity was 8 μg/g. Higher bed volumes (585) and high arsenic removal capacity (5.69 μg/cm3) were achieved with ion exchange resins among all the media studied. Poor performance was observed with manganese greensand and iron oxide coated sand-1 (IOCS-1).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArsenic contamination and mitigationFrench-language works237,207